The playbook
Marketing Attribution: Template and Field Guide
This marketing attribution template turns a broad task into a record another person can use. It captures touchpoint, conversion, window, then connects that information to a decision. Copy the table into your working document or system and create a separate record for each item in scope.
Put the task in context
State the model and window before comparing channel performance. The same sale can receive credit in several platforms. Attribution describes an allocation method; it does not by itself prove that the sale would not have occurred without the campaign.
Copyable worksheet
| Field | Entry instructions |
|---|---|
| touchpoint | Record the touchpoint associated with this campaign or conversion record. Use a stable reference so later updates can be matched. |
| conversion | Record the conversion associated with this campaign or conversion record. Keep the value specific enough for another owner to interpret. |
| window | Record the window associated with this campaign or conversion record. Keep the value specific enough for another owner to interpret. |
| model | Record the model associated with this campaign or conversion record. Keep the value specific enough for another owner to interpret. |
| Decision field | Entry instructions |
|---|---|
| Observed problem | Describe the actual condition and where it was observed. |
| Recommended action | State the smallest action that resolves the documented problem. |
| Evidence | Link to the record, observation, or test supporting the action. |
| Owner and next review | Name the accountable person and when the decision should be revisited. |
How to complete the worksheet
Begin with touchpoint. Use the same reference throughout the record so notes are not attached to the wrong item. Then define identity events and conversion windows. This establishes the information required before the worksheet becomes a request for action.
Next, document how credit is assigned across touchpoints. Use the observed problem and evidence fields to explain why that step is needed. A useful entry describes an actual condition, such as treating attributed credit as proof of incremental causation, rather than a broad instruction to “improve performance.”
Finally, compare model outputs with actual business outcomes. Put explain the model's limitations and use experiments when feasible in the action field only when it addresses the observed condition. If the problem is different, change the action. The template is a structure for judgment, not a reason to apply the same fix everywhere.
Illustrative completed decision
| Part | Illustrative entry |
|---|---|
| Problem | Treating attributed credit as proof of incremental causation |
| Action | Explain the model's limitations and use experiments when feasible |
| First check | Define identity events and conversion windows |
| Follow-up check | Compare model outputs with actual business outcomes |
| Outcome to define | reconciled attributed outcomes |
Adapt the fields without losing meaning
You can add fields required by your team, but each should change a decision or preserve necessary context. Keep factual observations separate from recommendations. If conversion changes, record the new value and its effective date instead of silently rewriting the context of an earlier decision.
Use the record in a handoff
Ask the receiving owner to explain the next action using only the worksheet. Missing context becomes visible quickly during that exercise. Repair the record before applying the structure to a larger batch. Keep reconciled attributed outcomes connected to the item so the team can later assess whether the action was useful.
Choose an observation period that reflects the buying process. Immediate clicks, later inquiries, and completed sales happen at different times. Keep the attribution window and any incomplete outcomes visible when comparing campaigns.
Skip the manual steps. Let AgentixFLO run this for every client.
Start now